ENTERTAINMENT
“I’m disappointed that I didn’t win this case. But I’m even more disappointed that I have lost a right that I thought I had as an American: the ability to speak freely and openly” said the actress. She is slated to star in the Aquaman sequel, releasing next year.
She continued, “I’m even more dissatisfied with the implications of this decision for other women. It’s a stumbling block. It turns the clock back to when a woman who spoke out and spoke out could be publically humiliated and shamed.” Ms. Heard’s spokesman has stated that she intends to appeal the decision.
This was a news story where everyone had access to the source material. Millions of people were able to participate and talk due to this access.
We were able to see reaction shots of the main characters and facial expressions, and other unforgettable moments unrelated to the main plot.
The judge’s expression was sufficient proof. Even for American justice, the spectacle of the doorman, Alejandro Romero, presenting his evidence by Zoom from his car while vaping, then driving away, was unusual.
In addition, the fact that millions of people witnessed the events for themselves was also problematic. The public had made up their minds due to two people arguing radically opposing interpretations of events that occurred behind closed doors.